Divisive is the first word that comes to mind when I think about "The Talented Mr. Ripley."
I first saw it years ago, and like many movies from 1999 (great year), I immediately knew it was a movie to remember. I loved everything about it - from Matt Damon to Jude Law to John Seale's gorgeous cinematography. In fact, I loved it so much that I thought everyone else would love it, too (lest we forget my mainstream tastes)
Unfortunately, that wasn't the case at all. I knew others that loved it, sure, but I also came across a number of nasty haters. "Oh, it was too creepy!" they'd say and "It made me uncomfortable!", and even - to my horror - "That was the movie that made me hate Matt Damon forever!" Hence the word divisive.

Looking back on it now, I can understand why Miramax ultimately chose to campaign "The Cider House Rules" over "The Talented Mr. Ripley" - assuming it was between the two, anyway. While "Ripley" made you nervous and cringe, "The Cider House Rules" made you laugh, and most importantly cry.
Still, I can't help but feel that "The Talented Mr. Ripley" was a missed opportunity for Oscar. To this day, having seen it now 4 or 5 times, the movie feels as fresh and psychologically captivating as it did when I first saw it. In fact, with this screening I found myself discovering things I hadn't even thought of before, something that so rarely happens with movies these days.

Take Matt Damon, for example. Damon's performance is probably the most difficult thing to digest in the movie. His character does things that are beyond reasonable - i.e., stealing identities, killing people, prancing around in Jude Law's clothes. But his performance is also the film's most crucial element. Instead of playing it over the top, Damon opts for a very stubtle approach, as though he locked everything inside of Ripley's basement. As a result, Damon makes Ripley a believeable character, which is why when we see him do these things we can't help but cringe. At the same time, he draws us in as though we were watching a trainwreck. We can't believe the things that he's doing, yet we also can't look away.
How this guy wasn't nominated for an Oscar is beyond me.
But Damon isn't the sole reason to watch "Ripley." There's also Jude Law, who has the difficult task of making the most of limited screentime. Like Rachel Weisz in "The Constant Gardener," Law's Dickie Greenleaf becomes a driving force in the 2nd act of the movie, and it's important for him to make the audience respond to Dickie while he can. Of course, Dickie isn't the most likeable character, either. If anything, he's a spoiled, ADD-ridden brat. But like Marge (played luminously by Gwyneth Paltrow) told Ripley earlier in the movie, when we see Law on screen it really does feel like the sun is shining. It's a completely irresistable (and Oscar-worthy!, ed) performance.

Speaking of Paltrow, she, too, should have been nominated. For the longest time I thought I felt this way just because I love Gwyneth. Yet, watching her performance again I was amazed by the strength of her presence. Her role is a bit of a cliche one - meaning, she plays the grief-stricken girlfriend. However, she takes the role beyond that, and in each scene is able to make an impression that goes well beyond what might have been expected from her. Perhaps it's because she knows what we know, but Marge is an instantly sympathetic character.
I could go on, of course, but since this is a movie club (and since I have a hangover :( ) I'd like to hear from you guys. So tell me: What did you think of "The Talented Mr. Ripley"?
Note: I'll jump in on the discussion peroidically throughout the day.